On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:19 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > In HACKING
Thanks for the suggestions. > If you have made *no* changes: > git pull > > If you *have* made changes and committed them to "master", do this: > git fetch > git rebase origin > > OK, but add > > If you *have* made changes but *have not* committed them to > "master", do this: > > As to what "this" should be, well I don't know. If you have committed changes on a topic branch - and this is usually the most convenient way to work on non-trivial changes - see "Make your changes on a private "topic" branch" below. If you have uncommitted changes in your working copy, most operations will not affect them. Still, it is probably simplest to commit them to a topic branch; otherwise changes that "git checkout" needs to make could be blocked by your local changes. > > As to what "this" should be, well I don't know. All I know is "fetch", > "committed to master"... must be some BDSM game :-) > > > _______________________________________________ > Bug-coreutils mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils > _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
