Hello, as reported in rhbz #485712 , nl incorrectly states that long format for -v is --first-page. Info documentation is correct and informs about --starting-line-number as correct long option for -v. I guess best way is to fix usage (and to not add --first-page option) as afaik nobody complained so far.
Greetings,
Ondrej
From 351bde49a4f5218528772a925ed1a2a42df30365 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?utf-8?q?Ond=C5=99ej=20Va=C5=A1=C3=ADk?= <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:29:33 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] nl: correct long-option name for -v in usage * nl.c (usage): Use starting-line-number instead of first-page for -v --- src/nl.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/nl.c b/src/nl.c index ddd0fcf..578a7aa 100644 --- a/src/nl.c +++ b/src/nl.c @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ Mandatory arguments to long options are mandatory for short options too.\n\ -s, --number-separator=STRING add STRING after (possible) line number\n\ "), stdout); fputs (_("\ - -v, --first-page=NUMBER first line number on each logical page\n\ + -v, --starting-line-number=NUMBER first line number on each logical page\n\ -w, --number-width=NUMBER use NUMBER columns for line numbers\n\ "), stdout); fputs (HELP_OPTION_DESCRIPTION, stdout); -- 1.5.6.1.156.ge903b
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
_______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
