Adam Gordon wrote:
> This seems like it would be a simple feature and while it may overlap
> with (or be slightly redundant to) the sort command, sorting
> lexicographically, i.e., foo1, foo2, foo10, foo20 instead of foo1,
> foo10, foo2, foo20, would be a nice feature to have.

Does `ls -v` do what you want?

cheers,
Pádraig.


_______________________________________________
Bug-coreutils mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils

Reply via email to