Sami Kerola wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 15:20, Sami Kerola <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Well I changed rename to copy that is part of coreutils and use the >> call in move_mode. I did not send new patch because I want to be sure >> my employer has signed papers stating that they have no right to my >> contributions to coreutils. Perhaps I should wait copyright papers to >> get ready before making questions. It's a bit difficult to ask >> questions && get correct answers when you don't see what I am talking >> about. > > Hello again, > > My legal papers are ready to be sent to Boston. I'll be in touch with > GNU copyright personel tomorrow. Since it should be now safe to send > patches here is next one. Quite honestly I am not 100% happy about it. > The patch does quite much everything that you'd expect, but there are > two issues.
The patch adds loads of options to unexpand from a 10s look. I thought all we were going to do was add a simple patch to cp to support the --attributes-only option? Then inplace editing falls naturally from a simple wrapper around that. cheers, Pádraig. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
