Kamil Dudka wrote: > Hi Jim, > > On Sat July 25 2009 16:36:13 Jim Meyering wrote: >> In the mean time, I've written a test for this. >> Along the way, I noticed that ls -UR1 no longer works the >> way I would expect, since the -R is effectively ignored. >> This suggests that we may want to disable the optimization also >> when -R is specified. > > I've decided to make a trade-off. The optimization now works correctly when > more directories are given as ls' arguments, but it is bypassed when -R > or -s option is used. The patch should be applied on top of yours. > > Please prioritize review of this bug fix if possible. I am leaving for > vacation tomorrow, far from internet. Thanks in advance!
Thanks. That is reasonable. I've juggled our patches a little so that your fix comes before the test (so as not to hinder bisection) and has the NEWS entry. Have a nice vacation. _______________________________________________ Bug-coreutils mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils
