James Youngman wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Jim Meyering<[email protected]> wrote: >> Here's an interesting patch. > [...] >> It'd be great if another pair of eyes could glance through >> these changes (diffs look "big", but most hunks are simply removals). > > I read the patch, but don't have any comments. Partly this is because > it is hard to get a sense of the new flow of the code by reading the > patch only. I'd have to apply it and read the result, really. I > will try to find time to do that too.
Thanks! I agree that the patch by itself is illegible. I find that applying a patch and then running Emacs' ediff-revision is a good way to view highlighted side-by-side differences.
