Eric Blake wrote:
> According to Pádraig Brady on 9/10/2009 6:29 AM:
>> While this patch is more verbose than my previous patch
>> in this thread, it is more accurate. So let's drop the
>> previous one.
>
>> + printf (_("\n\
>> +If none of the environment variables BLOCKSIZE, BLOCK_SIZE or
>> %s_BLOCK_SIZE\n\
>> +or --block-size option specify SIZE, display in units of 1024 bytes.\n\
>> +(or 512 bytes if the POSIXLY_CORRECT environment variable is set)\n\
>> +"), program);
>
> Grammar was awkward. If we keep that wording, the final period should be
> after the () comment, not before. But what about a completely different
> wording (wrapped as appropriate):
>
> Block size is the first available size from the --block-size option, the
> %s_BLOCK_SIZE, BLOCK_SIZE, or BLOCKSIZE environment variables, and
> defaults to 1024 bytes (or 512 bytes if POSIXLY_CORRECT is set).
That doesn't actually say what "block size" controls though,
nor does it suggest you can use SIZE format strings in the environment
variables.
How about:
Display values are in units of the first available SIZE from --block-size,
and the %s_BLOCK_SIZE, BLOCK_SIZE, and BLOCKSIZE environment variables,
and defaults to 1024 bytes (or 512 bytes if POSIXLY_CORRECT is set).
