Jim Meyering wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Here's a fix to make ls -LR work the same way Solaris 10's /bin/ls >> does in the presence of a cycle.
It makes sense to exit(2) along with the printed error. The patch looks good. cheers, Pádraig.
Jim Meyering wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> Here's a fix to make ls -LR work the same way Solaris 10's /bin/ls >> does in the presence of a cycle.
It makes sense to exit(2) along with the printed error. The patch looks good. cheers, Pádraig.