Eric Blake wrote: > According to Jim Meyering on 9/29/2009 5:13 AM: >> - /* The failed stat/lstat may have modified f->stat. Clear it, >> - since we may use at least its st_ino member, e.g., >> - when trying to print the inode of dangling symlink: >> - mkdir d; ln -s no-such d/s; ls -Li d */ >> - memset (&f->stat, 0, sizeof (f->stat)); >> + f->stat.st_ino = 22; > > Why 22? Is this debugging leftovers?
haha, yes. Thanks ;-)
