Pádraig Brady <P <at> draigBrady.com> writes:
> __xstat64(3, "symlink",
0xbfee893c) = 0
> linkat(-100, 0xbfee8d3e, -100, 0xbfee8d46,
1024) = -1
> stat64("symlink", {st_mode=S_IFREG|0664, st_size=0, ...}) = 0
> connect(-100, {sa_family=0x7973 /* AF_??? */, sa_data="mlink\0hardlink"},
4294967196) = -1 EINVAL
Cute - those two lines match between the two straces, but the second trace
doesn't know about the linkat syscall, and tries to interpret it as a connect
syscall instead.
But yep, definite proof that linkat(,AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW) needs a rpl_linkat
wrapper.
--
Eric Blake
