[email protected] wrote: > Gentlemen, I object. The messages for these two commands should be different. > $ cp -v f g > `f' -> `g' > $ mv -v f g > `f' -> `g' > Exactly how different etc. I leave up to you. Maybe even just => for the > latter instead of ->.
I think it's fine from the context as is? If one was going to change it I'd have: file == file_copy file -> file_rename file => file_copy_unlink But I don't see the need TBH. cheers, Pádraig.
