On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Andreas Schwab <sch...@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > Roel Kluin <roel.kl...@gmail.com> writes: > >> unicode characters 0x24, 0x40 and 0x60 were not considered as valid >> characters. > > $ /usr/bin/printf '\u0024\u0040\u0060\n' > $...@` > $ /usr/bin/printf --version > printf (GNU coreutils) 8.3 > [...] > >> I believe this was intended: > > Definitely not. > >> + && (uni_value != 0x24 || uni_value != 0x40 || uni_value != 0x60)) > > A roundabout way to write 1. > > Andreas.
Yes, I was totally mistaken. Sorry for the fuzz. Roel
