Christophe LYON wrote: > I have built coreutils-8.3 and ran 'make check' on a few systems and I > have noticed some FAILs as follows. Given their old age, I am not sure > it is worth reporting, though. > > * Linux RedHat 3/x86: tail-2/inotify-hash-abuse, log extract: > + kill -HUP 15829 > [1]+ Hangup tail $debug -qF $(seq $n) >out 2>&1 > + wait 15829 > ./tail-2/inotify-hash-abuse: line 59: wait: pid 15829 is not a child > of this shell > + st=127 > + echo tail died via unexpected signal: 127 > tail died via unexpected signal: 127 > + fail=1 > > * Linux RedHat 3/x86: tail-2/inotify-hash-abuse2, log extract: > + kill -HUP 16044 > ./tail-2/inotify-hash-abuse2: line 40: kill: (16044) - No such process > + wait 16044 > + st=124 > + echo tail died via unexpected signal: 124 > tail died via unexpected signal: 124 > + fail=1 > > * Linux RedHat 3/x86_64: test-utimens (test-utimens.h:101: assertion failed) > > * Linux RedHat 4/x86: test-nanosleep (test-nanosleep.c:78: assertion failed) > * Linux RedHat 4/x86: test-sleep (test-sleep.c:53: assertion failed)
Thanks for the report. Can you repeat the tests with the very latest snapshot? http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.gz 9.4 MB http://meyering.net/cu/coreutils-ss.tar.xz 4.0 MB If any of those failures persist, we *might* have time to address one or two before coreutils-8.4, which is slated to be released today.
