Eric Blake wrote: > Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net> writes: > >> I'm planning to release coreutils-8.4 tomorrow. >> It will be a build-fix-only release, along with a minor bug fix >> for the relatively new command, nproc. > > 3 failures on Solaris 8, but probably not worth worrying about since that > platform is so old: > > > FAIL: tail-2/inotify-hash-abuse2 (exit: 1) > ========================================== ... Thanks for checking/reporting that. That should be fixed by Pádraig's patch.
> FAIL: install/install-C (exit: 1) > ================================= > ... > + skip_if_setgid_ > + setgid_tmpdir=setgid-27283 > + umask 77 > + mkdir setgid-27283 > ++ stat --printf %A setgid-27283 > + perms=drwx------ > + rmdir setgid-27283 > + mode1=0644 > + mode2=0755 > + mode3=2755 > + echo test > + echo '`a'\'' -> `b'\''' > + echo 'removed `b'\'' > `a'\'' -> `b'\''' > + : > + ginstall -Cv -m0644 a b > + compare out out_installed_first > + diff -u out out_installed_first > + ginstall -Cv -m0644 a b > + compare out out_empty > + diff -u out out_empty > --- out 2010-01-12 09:15:33.996514000 -0700 > +++ out_empty 2010-01-12 09:15:33.941516000 -0700 > @@ -1,2 +0,0 @@ > -removed `b' > -`a' -> `b' > + fail=1 I've seen this several times already. It'd be good to fix it eventually, if only to avoid spending any more time with failure reports. But since it's related only to install's -C option, it's not a high priority at all. > FAIL: ls/stat-vs-dirent (exit: 1) > ================================= > ... Looks like an oddity at a mount point. I'm happy to leave this one unaddressed, for now. > + st_ino=540483 > + test -n 540399 > + test 540399 '!=' 540483 > + echo './ls/stat-vs-dirent: test failed: /home/Algol1: d_ino(540399) != > st_ino > (540483) > This may indicate a flaw in your kernel or file system implementation. > The flaw isn'\''t serious for coreutils, but it might break other > tools, > so you should report it to your operating system vendor.' > ./ls/stat-vs-dirent: test failed: /home/Algol1: d_ino(540399) != > st_ino(540483) > This may indicate a flaw in your kernel or file system implementation. > The flaw isn't serious for coreutils, but it might break other tools, > so you should report it to your operating system vendor.
