Jon Stanley wrote: > Yeah, like Eric said, I think that this is a csh problem rather than a > coreutils problem. I would even think that csh is behaving wrongly > here - rather than refusing to run rm because the glob didn't match, > it should pass the f* straight through to rm to deal with as it > pleases, unless you explicitly told the shell to fail (as Eric did in > his example). I don't have any standards to back that up though, Eric > is the POSIX-citing guy around here :)
The 'csh' is not covered by any standards. There is only the csh implementation for reference. It does what it does. Bob
