Here's an obvious patch to simplify src/Makefile.am now that gnulib strtod no longer needs libm. Is it OK to install this?
>From 018e0adb679ac8ba713de00c1afb686395ce13fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul R. Eggert <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:29:37 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] omit $(POW_LIB) when linking, as this is no longer needed * src/Makefile.am (printf_LDADD, seq_LDADD, sleep_LDADD, sort_LDADD): (tail_LDADD, uptime_LDADD): Omit $(POW_LIB), as it's no longer needed due to recent gnulib changes, where the strtod module no longer uses the pow function. strtold needs pow only because it's sometimes aliased to strtod. See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-07/msg00076.html --- src/Makefile.am | 8 -------- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/Makefile.am b/src/Makefile.am index 2e0e320..d87fbb5 100644 --- a/src/Makefile.am +++ b/src/Makefile.am @@ -343,14 +343,6 @@ ls_LDADD += $(LIB_CAP) dd_LDADD += $(LIB_FDATASYNC) shred_LDADD += $(LIB_FDATASYNC) -# for strtod, strtold -printf_LDADD += $(POW_LIB) -seq_LDADD += $(POW_LIB) -sleep_LDADD += $(POW_LIB) -sort_LDADD += $(POW_LIB) -tail_LDADD += $(POW_LIB) -uptime_LDADD += $(POW_LIB) - # for xnanosleep sleep_LDADD += $(LIB_NANOSLEEP) sort_LDADD += $(LIB_NANOSLEEP) -- 1.7.1
