I've realized that the 'bug' is in my reading of the man page, not the implementation, my bad.
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Tim Blair <[email protected]> wrote: > [tim]$ /usr/bin/tac test.txt > six > five > four > three > two > one > [tim]$ /usr/bin/tac --separator=blah test.txt > one > two > three > four > five > six > > The output of the first command makes sense, but I think that the second > run should print in the reverse order (and should have the separator, > although I could be misreading the man page) > > Tim >
