tags 8295 moreinfo tags 8295 notabug thanks Andreas Stolcke wrote: > In message <4d855f74.3070...@cs.ucla.edu>you wrote: >> On 03/19/2011 12:04 PM, Andreas Stolcke wrote: >> > - Several places where iterator variables are declared inside >> > for(), failing compiles >> > on systems that support c99. >> >> I assume you meant "systems that don't support c99". > > right. > >> >> The README file has a section "Pre-C99 build failure" >> about that. Which compiler were you using, and why >> didn't "configure" successfully put it into c99 mode? > > gcc-3.4.6 on mips-sgi-irix5.3, the last version i was able build on this old > box. > Good question, i don't know why configure didn't add -std=c99 to the CFLAGS. > That would be the easier fix.
I've marked this as notabug for now, presuming the probmem is due to your compiler. Please let us know if you learn otherwise.