On 29/05/11 01:28, Ola Olsson wrote:
>  <[email protected]>According to valgrind, ls -l leaks memory. I have
> included the "coreutils version", "uname -a" information, Expected output
> from valgrind ("ls") and non-expected output ("ls -l").

ls does leak but inconsequentially.
Explicitly freeing the memory would only waste
time managing the heap just before we'd exit anyway.

cheers,
Pádraig.



Reply via email to