[re-adding the list again - there's a reason that we prefer public lists]
On 08/10/2011 04:07 PM, vesselin kavalov wrote:
Hi Eric, yes, I can do SHA, but on the real file contents only! That's why I hate soft links! because everything may stay the same, but a change of where a soft link points to is undetectable and U get different results of subsequent compiles. I probably will go brute force and set restrictive unix permissions on a different user and group ownership.
You can do SHA on symlink contents, by using readlink on those symlinks. Your claim that symlink changes are undetectable is bogus.
-- Eric Blake [email protected] +1-801-349-2682 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
