Bob Proulx wrote: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> FYI, Kamil's original mail never to have reached the mailing list[*], > > It was sitting in the debbugs-submit queue waiting for a human. I > reviewed the queues a few minutes ago and sent it through. At least I > am pretty sure it was the same message I saw there. I hadn't realized > it was something to note until after I read the thread here just now. > Here is the interesting part of the trail. > > Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) > by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) > (envelope-from <[email protected]>) > id 1RaC73-0002OB-Uh > for [email protected]; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:04:40 -0500 > Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]) > by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) > (envelope-from <[email protected]>) id 1Ra5Mj-0000gC-LJ > for [email protected]; Mon, 12 Dec 2011 07:52:23 -0500 > >> in spite of reaching debbugs and acquiring a bug number > > That does seem strange since I didn't think it got a bug number until > after it went through debbugs. It had a bug number and so it must > have already gone through debbugs. It must work differently from that > somehow. > >> and then going on to reach Paul (the Cc'd recipient). > > Of course the CC would be a direct message outside of any of the bug > tracking and mailing lists.
Thanks, Bob. I forgot about the debbugs queue. I checked only the bug-coreutils mailman admin queue.
