On 07/01/2012 12:29 AM, Karl Berry wrote: > Hi Stefano, > > coreutils.texi:2207: @itemx must follow @item > > I imagine the diagnostic is correct. > Sorry if I hasn't been clear, but I meant the CC: to 'texinfo-devel' just as an "FYI" to you, not a bug report (otherwise I'd have written to bug-texinfo ;-). I thought you might be interested in seeing how your improved diagnostic behaves "in the wild".
> @itemx must follow @item. > Otherwise the TeX output is wrong. Previous makeinfo unfortunately did > not warn about this. The solution is to fix the manual :). > > coreutils.texi:9888: warning: Node next `chown invocation' in menu `touch > invocation' and in sectioning `chgrp invocation' differ > > Would have to see the source. Looks like the menus list the nodes in a > different order than they actually appear, and/or the master menu (can't > remember if coreutils.texi has one) differs from the real menu. > > k > > P.S. I took bug-coreutils out of cc simply because I didn't want to deal > with "opening" a bug report (doesn't it require the bug number somewhere > to append)? > I don't think so; the debbugs software should be smart enough to realize that you're answering to a massage that has already opened a bug report, and it should thus avoid to open a new bug report. I might be wrong on this, though, and I don't feel inclined to experiment right now. > Please forward so it does the right thing, if you like. > Done. Regards, Stefano
