Thanks very much for that test case; I've confirmed the bug on my platform with the latest 'sort'. If nobody else gets to it I will try to take a look at it when I find the time (most likely in a week or so).
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-duplicates Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-duplicates Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-duplicates Eric Blake
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-duplicate... Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-dupli... Jim Meyering
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-dupli... Pádraig Brady
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-duplicates Paul Eggert
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-duplicate... Jim Meyering
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-dupli... Jim Meyering
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-d... Jim Meyering
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out ... Jim Meyering
- bug#9780: sort -u throws ... Bernhard Voelker
- bug#9780: sort -u throws ... Jim Meyering
- bug#9780: sort -u throws out non-d... Jim Meyering
- bug#9780: sort -u data loss d... Jim Meyering
- bug#9780: sort -u data lo... Bernhard Voelker
- bug#9780: sort -u data lo... Jim Meyering
