Thanks, um... (update docs? -- manpages?)
Pádraig Brady wrote:
On 09/23/2012 12:12 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
I think there was general consensus that the status=noinfo should be
applied
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2010-02/msg00159.html
I'll look at that this evening.
I changed things a bit in the attached patch.
I used 'status=none' rather than 'status=noinfo',
to make it obvious all stderr messages were being suppressed.
Also, I kept the bitmask nature of the existing code
to make it more consistent and extendible.
cheers,
Pádraig.
