On 11/26/2012 10:51 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > Paul: you were against this in the past [1], but in light of > 594d5064c950fa1d99a9eafbd357c5f46320d002, can we reconsider ?
I'm not sure what that hexadecimal number refers to, but my objection originally was to the hassle of maintaining something, but if the GNU/Linux folks have an agreed-upon way of generating -p and -i from /proc/cpuinfo then I suppose we could fold it in.
