On Saturday, July 27 2013, Paul Eggert wrote: > That format is typically considered to be erroneous, e.g., > <http://www.grammar.com/dates-day-month-year/>, so I'm > not sure parse_datetime should be supporting it.
I wasn't aware parse_datetime followed a defined grammar. And this seems to be an English grammar idiosyncrasy, which is definitely not familiar to me (not a native english speaker). IMO, I don't really see a problem supporting an "erroneous English grammar", since parse_datetime should probably not be so strict about it and adapt to such small cases. Anyway, just my opinion. -- Sergio
