On 11/21/2013 09:18 AM, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > On 11/21/2013 04:06 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> Hard to say that it is considerable bloat without seeing a patch; we >> already know when the top-level arguments are directories thanks to >> 'rm -d'. > > Here's a draft - not tested more than this:
> +++ b/src/remove.h > @@ -52,6 +52,10 @@ struct rm_options > /* If true, remove empty directories. */ > bool remove_empty_directories; > > + /* If true (and the -r option is also specified), remove all children > + of directory arguments, yet retaining the directory itself. */ > + bool children_only; Should --children-only imply -r, rather than being a no-op when -r is missing? -- Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
