On 11/27/2013 04:14 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote:
> On 11/26/2013 11:08 PM, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
>> +#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> +# Exercise "rm -r /" without and with the --preserve-root option.
>> +# Also exercise the synonyms '///' and '////' which would normally go into
>> +# the 'synonyms' test category below; but due to the way gnulib's fts_open()
>> +# performs trimming of trailing slashes ("///" -> "/"), the error diagnostic
>> +# is the same as for a bare "/", see the ROOT_DEV_INO_WARN macro.
>> +# Expect a non-Zero exit status.
>> +for opts in '/' '--preserve-root /' '///' '////'; do
>
> This relies on that fts behavior, which I'm a bit wary about coupling to.
> I'd be inclined to lump all the synonyms together and just
> be less stringent in the error message we compare there.
Good point, done.
While at it, I separated the "refusing to remove '.' or '..'" cases
from the "it is dangerous to operate recursively on '/'" cases.
>> + exercise_rm_r_root $opts \
>> + && fail=1
>
> So this call has 2s to work or we fail the test.
> That seems too short from experience of running many tests
> in parallel on slow/loaded systems.
> This is at odds of course with trying to get rm not run
> for too long. As I said I wouldn't bother with that constraint,
> and I can't think how to avoid false failures doing that.
The whole test with 21 test cases lasts .5 - .8 seconds here on
a 3-4 year-old PC - measured via "time make tests/rm/r-root.log".
I'd vote for being conservative for now, i.e. stay with "timeout 2",
and increase the timeout if we see false positives.
>> +for file in \
>> + 'rootlink/' \
>> + 'rootlink2/' \
>> + 'rootlink3/' \
>> + '//' \
>> + '//.' \
>> + '/./' \
>> + '/../' \
>> + '/.././' \
>> + '/bin/..' ; do
>
> I'm still worried about /bin being always present.
> How about: test -d "$file" || continue
Good idea, added.
That reminded me that on some systems /usr/bin and /bin
may be the same, and switched to testing '/etc/..'.
> /me doubles checks unlinkat() is the only function that should be called,
> and the previous checks guarantee this... OK :)
Not quite: it only checked for a directory.
I added a check for a file.
> p.s. something that might be worth looking at in future,
> would be to use runcon to restrict the process using selinux
> if in selinux enforcing mode.
I've never used selinux (knowingly), so I don't know much about
it. But feel free to add it. ;-)
Thanks for the review!
Have a nice day,
Berny
>From a9819408b4d96b399373de4041628552ef053f7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernhard Voelker <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 01:02:22 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] tests: add a test for rm -r "/"
* tests/rm/r-root.sh: Add a non-root test.
* tests/local.mk (all_tests): Mention the test.
---
tests/local.mk | 1 +
tests/rm/r-root.sh | 248 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 249 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/rm/r-root.sh
diff --git a/tests/local.mk b/tests/local.mk
index 19bbbd7..9b851f4 100644
--- a/tests/local.mk
+++ b/tests/local.mk
@@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ all_tests = \
tests/rm/r-2.sh \
tests/rm/r-3.sh \
tests/rm/r-4.sh \
+ tests/rm/r-root.sh \
tests/rm/readdir-bug.sh \
tests/rm/rm1.sh \
tests/touch/empty-file.sh \
diff --git a/tests/rm/r-root.sh b/tests/rm/r-root.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..aa52bc4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/rm/r-root.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,248 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+# Try to remove '/' recursively.
+
+# Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
+# (at your option) any later version.
+
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+# GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+# along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
+
+. "${srcdir=.}/tests/init.sh"; path_prepend_ ./src
+print_ver_ rm
+
+# POSIX mandates rm(1) to skip '/' arguments. This test verifies this mandated
+# behavior as well as the --preserve-root and --no-preserve-root options.
+# Especially the latter case is a live fire exercise as rm(1) is supposed to
+# enter the unlinkat() system call. Therefore, limit the risk as much
+# as possible -- if there's a bug this test would wipe the system out!
+
+# Faint-hearted: skip this test for the 'root' user.
+skip_if_root_
+
+# Pull the teeth from rm(1) by intercepting the unlinkat() system call via the
+# LD_PRELOAD environment variable. This requires shared libraries to work.
+require_gcc_shared_
+
+cat > k.c <<'EOF' || framework_failure_
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <unistd.h>
+
+int unlinkat (int dirfd, const char *pathname, int flags)
+{
+ /* Prove that LD_PRELOAD works: create the evidence file "x". */
+ fclose (fopen ("x", "w"));
+
+ /* Immediately terminate, unless indicated otherwise. */
+ if (! getenv("CU_TEST_SKIP_EXIT"))
+ _exit (0);
+
+ /* Pretend success. */
+ return 0;
+}
+EOF
+
+# Then compile/link it:
+gcc -Wall --std=gnu99 -shared -fPIC -ldl -O2 k.c -o k.so \
+ || framework_failure_ 'failed to build shared library'
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# exercise_rm_r_root: shell function to test "rm -r '/'"
+# The caller must provide the FILE to remove as well as any options
+# which should be passed to 'rm'.
+# Paranoia mode on:
+# For the worst case where both rm(1) would fail to refuse to process the "/"
+# argument (in the cases without the --no-preserve-root option), and
+# intercepting the unlinkat(1) system call would fail (which actually already
+# has been proven to work above), and the current non root user has
+# write access to "/", limit the damage to the current file system via
+# the --one-file-system option.
+# Furthermore, run rm(1) via timeout(1) that kills that process after
+# a maximum of 2 seconds.
+exercise_rm_r_root ()
+{
+ # Remove the evidence file "x"; verify that.
+ rm -f x || framework_failure_
+ test -f x && framework_failure_
+
+ local skip_exit=
+ if [ "$CU_TEST_SKIP_EXIT" = 1 ]; then
+ # Pass on this variable into 'rm's environment.
+ skip_exit='CU_TEST_SKIP_EXIT=1'
+ fi
+
+ timeout --signal=KILL 2 \
+ env LD_PRELOAD=./k.so $skip_exit \
+ rm -rv --one-file-system "$@" > out 2> err
+
+ return $?
+}
+
+# Verify that "rm -r dir" basically works.
+mkdir dir || framework_failure_
+rm -r dir || framework_failure_
+test -d dir && framework_failure_
+
+# Now verify that intercepting unlinkat() works:
+# rm(1) must succeed as before, but this time both the evidence file "x"
+# and the test file / directory must still exist afterward.
+mkdir dir || framework_failure_
+: > file || framework_failure_
+
+skip=
+for file in dir file ; do
+ exercise_rm_r_root "$file" || skip=1
+ test -e "$file" || skip=1
+ test -f x || skip=1
+
+ test $skip = 1 \
+ && { cat out; cat err; \
+ skip_ "internal test failure: maybe LD_PRELOAD doesn't work?"; }
+done
+
+# "rm -r /" without --no-preserve-root should output the following
+# diagnostic error message.
+cat <<EOD > exp || framework_failure_
+rm: it is dangerous to operate recursively on '/'
+rm: use --no-preserve-root to override this failsafe
+EOD
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Exercise "rm -r /" without and with the --preserve-root option.
+# Exercise various synonyms of "/" including symlinks to it.
+# Expect a non-Zero exit status.
+# Prepare a few symlinks to "/".
+ln -s / rootlink || framework_failure_
+ln -s rootlink rootlink2 || framework_failure_
+ln -sr / rootlink3 || framework_failure_
+
+for opts in \
+ '/' \
+ '--preserve-root /' \
+ '//' \
+ '///' \
+ '////' \
+ 'rootlink/' \
+ 'rootlink2/' \
+ 'rootlink3/' ; do
+
+ exercise_rm_r_root $opts \
+ && fail=1
+
+ # For some of the synonyms, the error diagnostic slightly differs from that
+ # of the basic "/" case (see gnulib's fts_open' and ROOT_DEV_INO_WARN):
+ # rm: it is dangerous to operate recursively on 'FILE' (same as '/')
+ # Strip that part off for the following comparison.
+ sed "s/\(rm: it is dangerous to operate recursively on\).*$/\1 '\/'/" err \
+ > err2 || framework_failure_
+
+ # Expect nothing in 'out' and the above error diagnostic in 'err2'.
+ # As rm(1) should have skipped the "/" argument, it does not call unlinkat().
+ # Therefore, the evidence file "x" should not exist.
+ compare /dev/null out || fail=1
+ compare exp err2 || fail=1
+ test -f x && fail=1
+
+ # Do nothing more if this test failed.
+ test $fail = 1 && { cat out; cat err; Exit $fail; }
+done
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Exercise "rm -r file1 / file2".
+# Expect a non-Zero exit status representing failure to remove "/",
+# yet 'file1' and 'file2' should be removed.
+: > file1 || framework_failure_
+: > file2 || framework_failure_
+
+# Now that we know that 'rm' won't call the unlinkat() system function for "/",
+# we could probably execute it without the LD_PRELOAD'ed safety net.
+# Nevertheless, it's still better to use it for this test.
+# Tell the unlinkat() replacement function to not _exit(0) immediately
+# by setting the following variable.
+CU_TEST_SKIP_EXIT=1
+
+exercise_rm_r_root --preserve-root file1 '/' file2 \
+ && fail=1
+
+unset CU_TEST_SKIP_EXIT
+
+cat <<EOD > out_removed
+removed 'file1'
+removed 'file2'
+EOD
+
+# The above error diagnostic should appear in 'err'.
+# Both 'file1' and 'file2' should be removed. Simply verify that in the
+# "out" file, as the replacement unlinkat() dummy did not remove them.
+# Expect the evidence file "x" to exist.
+compare out_removed out || fail=1
+compare exp err || fail=1
+test -f x || fail=1
+
+# Do nothing more if this test failed.
+test $fail = 1 && { cat out; cat err; Exit $fail; }
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Exercise various synonyms of "/" having a trailing "." or ".." in the name.
+# This triggers another check in the code first and therefore leads to a
+# different diagnostic. However, we want to test anyway to protect against
+# future reordering of the checks in the code.
+# Expect that other error diagnostic in 'err' and nothing in 'out'.
+# Expect a non-Zero exit status. The evidence file "x" should not exist.
+for file in \
+ '//.' \
+ '/./' \
+ '/.//' \
+ '/../' \
+ '/.././' \
+ '/etc/..' \
+ 'rootlink/..' \
+ 'rootlink2/.' \
+ 'rootlink3/./' ; do
+
+ test -d "$file" || continue # if e.g. /etc does not exist.
+
+ exercise_rm_r_root --preserve-root "$file" \
+ && fail=1
+
+ grep "^rm: refusing to remove '\.' or '\.\.' directory: skipping" err \
+ || fail=1
+
+ compare /dev/null out || fail=1
+ test -f x && fail=1
+
+ # Do nothing more if this test failed.
+ test $fail = 1 && { cat out; cat err; Exit $fail; }
+done
+
+#-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+# Until now, it was all just fun.
+# Now exercise the --no-preserve-root option with which rm(1) should enter
+# the intercepted unlinkat() system call.
+# As the interception code terminates the process immediately via _exit(0),
+# the exit status should be 0.
+# Use the option --interactive=never to bypass the following prompt:
+# "rm: descend into write-protected directory '/'?"
+exercise_rm_r_root --interactive=never --no-preserve-root '/' \
+ || fail=1
+
+# The 'err' file should not contain the above error diagnostic.
+grep "^rm: it is dangerous to operate recursively on '/'" err \
+ && fail=1
+
+# Instead, rm(1) should have called the intercepted unlinkat() function,
+# i.e. the evidence file "x" should exist.
+test -f x || fail=1
+
+test $fail = 1 && { cat out; cat err; }
+
+Exit $fail
--
1.8.3.1
