On 06/24/2014 09:12 AM, Michal Sekletar wrote: > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 05:56:10PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> OK the info docs are clear enough, stating that -h is the same as >> --block-size=human-readable etc. We might be able to tweak the >> --help (man page) for the -s and/or -h options accordingly also. > > Sorry, didn't look at info pages. In any case, tweaking man page would be very > appreciated. Thanks!
I'll push the attached later. thanks, Pádraig.
>From 6635f0b0f71f68ab4e9108091bc6049ddb143648 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?P=C3=A1draig=20Brady?= <[email protected]> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 10:33:41 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] doc: state in ls --help, that -h affects --size format * src/ls.c (usage): State that --human changes --size format. Fixes http://bugs.gnu.org/17838 --- src/ls.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/ls.c b/src/ls.c index 25e10fa..54c6705 100644 --- a/src/ls.c +++ b/src/ls.c @@ -4828,7 +4828,7 @@ Sort entries alphabetically if none of -cftuvSUX nor --sort is specified.\n\ "), stdout); fputs (_("\ -G, --no-group in a long listing, don't print group names\n\ - -h, --human-readable with -l, print sizes in human readable format\n\ + -h, --human-readable with -l and/or -s, print human readable sizes\n\ (e.g., 1K 234M 2G)\n\ --si likewise, but use powers of 1000 not 1024\n\ "), stdout); -- 1.7.7.6
