On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Jim Meyering <j...@meyering.net> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote: >> Jim Meyering wrote: >>> >>> the first variant compiled >>> just fine here (and probably everywhere), >>> so HAVE_GETGROUPLIST_WITH_INT was not defined. >> >> >> Yes, well, it did work on GNU/Linux, which is what I tested it on..... >> >> How about if we make the check pickier, so that it is likely to be triggered >> even without --enable-gcc-warnings, as in the attached? > > Thanks for another patch! Unfortunately, that still evokes only a > warning at least > with gcc 6.0.0 20150426.
Darn it. I see that I mistakenly pushed one of your patches when I pushed the linkat.m4 fix, Paul. Sorry about that. Happy to revert, if you'd like that. Let me know.
