On 06/09/16 18:18, Jim Meyering wrote: > On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Paul Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 09/06/2016 08:59 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >>> >>> Will push later. >> >> >> Before pushing, can you please change the name of "sigs" back to "sig"? I >> prefer the old name, as "sig[i]" clearly means "signal i", whereas "sigs[i]" >> is more confusing. (This is one of my pet peeves about array names.) Thanks. > > I agree. > A good argument for "why?" is that we optimize for readability of the > more frequent use with an index, sig[i], rather than for the sole > declaration, or the less frequent uses of the array name without an > index.
Ok done. I consolidated signal handler setup and restoration to a single function to allow that.
