On 15/09/17 20:44, Jim Meyering wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com> wrote:
> ...
>> That's a good improvement!
>
> Indeed!
>
>> <bikeshedding>
>> I'd change:
>>
>> s/missing more parameters after/missing parameter after/
>
> Or, perhaps use wording similar to what test does:
>
> ..._("missing argument after %s")better again
