On 27/11/17 07:18, Bernhard Voelker wrote: > [sending again, because the first try came back with some unclear > error message, and the message didn't show up on the ML so far.] > > On 11/24/2017 02:48 AM, Pádraig Brady wrote: >> Pushed with those improvements. > > Sorry, this comes a bit late. > > That change only added support for the long option, so the attached > makes timeout also recognize the short -v option as advertized in > usage+texi.
Blush. Please apply. > BTW: what do you think about a new syntax-check rule to verify that > all options in usage are actually supported? > Some of the option checks for some utilities might become complicated, > but maybe still worth ... I've caught this particular issue myself in a couple of patches from others, so I'll write a syntax check later today hopefully. thanks! Pádraig
