[email protected] wrote:
So it is not an unexpected behaviour of uniq -f, but of uniq / sort -u.
Thanks for clarifying. As this does not appear to be bug in uniq (or sort) I'm closing the bug report.
[email protected] wrote:
So it is not an unexpected behaviour of uniq -f, but of uniq / sort -u.
Thanks for clarifying. As this does not appear to be bug in uniq (or sort) I'm closing the bug report.