On 2020-07-31 16:32, Nick Alcock wrote:
> I get an ERROR when running rmdir/ignore.sh as root (but not when
> running as non-root). [...]
> ERROR: tests/rmdir/ignore
> =========================
[...]
> + mkdir -p x/y
> + chmod a-w x
> + returns_ 1 rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty x/y
> + fail=1
Thanks for reporting this issue.
Indeed, this test does not work as root.
The comment in the test explains that it expects an EPERM error:
# Ensure that with --ignore-fail-on-non-empty, we still fail, e.g., for EPERM.
# Between 6.11 and 8.31, the following rmdir would mistakenly succeed.
mkdir -p x/y || framework_failure_
chmod a-w x || framework_failure_
returns_ 1 rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty x/y || fail=1
but root does not see the EPERM; strace output:
...
rmdir("x/y") = 0
close(1) = 0
close(2) = 0
exit_group(0) = ?
+++ exited with 0 +++
The attached patch adds guards around the parts of the test which
only work as non-privileged user.
Have a nice day,
Berny
>From c0e5f8c59b951ae13ca9cb9945cd77163489e1d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bernhard Voelker <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2020 19:49:35 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] tests: skip some parts of 'tests/rmdir/ignore.sh' if run as
root
Parts of this test expect that the rmdir syscall returns with EPERM,
but the root user does not see that.
* tests/rmdir/ignore.sh: Add uid_is_privileged_ guards around parts
of the test which expect rmdir() to fail with EPERM.
Reported by Nick Alcock <[email protected]> in
https://bugs.gnu.org/42633
---
tests/rmdir/ignore.sh | 19 +++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/rmdir/ignore.sh b/tests/rmdir/ignore.sh
index 65e92d012..b26ac533a 100755
--- a/tests/rmdir/ignore.sh
+++ b/tests/rmdir/ignore.sh
@@ -33,17 +33,24 @@ test -d "$cwd/a/b/c" && fail=1
# Between 6.11 and 8.31, the following rmdir would mistakenly succeed.
mkdir -p x/y || framework_failure_
chmod a-w x || framework_failure_
-returns_ 1 rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty x/y || fail=1
+
+if ! uid_is_privileged_; then # root does not get EPERM.
+ returns_ 1 rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty x/y || fail=1
+fi
+
test -d x/y || fail=1
# Between 6.11 and 8.31, the following rmdir would mistakenly fail,
# and also give a non descript error
touch x/y/z || framework_failure_
rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty x/y || fail=1
test -d x/y || fail=1
-# assume empty dir if unreadable entries (so failure to remove diagnosed)
-rm x/y/z || framework_failure_
-chmod a-r x/y || framework_failure_
-returns_ 1 rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty x/y || fail=1
-test -d x/y || fail=1
+
+if ! uid_is_privileged_; then # root does not get EPERM.
+ # assume empty dir if unreadable entries (so failure to remove diagnosed)
+ rm x/y/z || framework_failure_
+ chmod a-r x/y || framework_failure_
+ returns_ 1 rmdir --ignore-fail-on-non-empty x/y || fail=1
+ test -d x/y || fail=1
+fi
Exit $fail
--
2.27.0
