On 4/14/21 9:43 PM, Stuart Blake Tener wrote: > Pádraig, > > [...] your response [...] was a bit offensive.
I don't feel Padraig's reply was offensive at all. Instead, he just asked for further clarification about the requested feature. Adding a clear example maybe would have helped. > --include-type=parm1[,parm2,parm3...] > A parameter representing a filesystem type to be additive to the > currently supported default list of filesystems. The default list of file systems includes all but dummy filesystems which do not occupy a backing store like e.g. the /proc or the /sys filesystems. Therefore, if someone would like to have a certain type additionally to that default list - which would obviously be such a dummy filesystem, then this would be quite a strange corner case IMO. As you mentioned ZFS in your original email, doesn't GNU df show that per default? That would be a bug. > --include-replace > this parameter overrides the default functionality of the > "--include-type" being additive to the currently supported list of > default filesystems and replaces that list with the filesystem or > filesystems so specified in the "--include-type" parameter. Sound like -type. Have a nice day, Berny