On 8/10/21 11:56 PM, L A Walsh wrote:
Perhaps the '-s' option in ls could pay attention to the user-specified block-size?
Doesn't it already do that? $ ls -s libc.so 12192 libc.so $ ls -s --block-size=1 libc.so 12484608 libc.so
On 8/10/21 11:56 PM, L A Walsh wrote:
Perhaps the '-s' option in ls could pay attention to the user-specified block-size?
Doesn't it already do that? $ ls -s libc.so 12192 libc.so $ ls -s --block-size=1 libc.so 12484608 libc.so