> On 2023-03-21, at 7:32 PM, Paul Eggert <egg...@cs.ucla.edu> wrote: > > On 3/21/23 08:27, George Valkov wrote: >> However since the old m4-1.4.19 in under tools/m4, coreutils builds with the >> legacy version: > > If you're building from that tarball, coreutils doesn't need m4. I just now > double-checked that, in an environment that didn't have m4. "./configure && > make check" succeeded. So the m4 version should be irrelevant.
Yes, I can confirm that a stand-alone build using your instructions works. I do not have enough experience with the OpenWRT build system, but what I can see is that at some point it tries to run staging_dir/host/bin/m4 And that’s why I had the impression that the legacy version of m4 is used. I might be wrong, and maybe it just needs that executable, since when tools/m4 is present, tools/coreutils builds and works. If the m4 directory from the tarball is used, then everything’s fine, we can keep tools/m4 as it is. staging_dir/host/bin/m4 is compiled from tools/m4 and does not exist without tools/m4, so the build fails if I remove it. If I create a link to /usr/local/Cellar/m4/1.4.19/bin/m4, that part of the build succeeds, but then we also need to apply the following patch: https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/blob/master/tools/coreutils/patches/001-m4.patch Do you know if the patch is applied upstream in coreutils? Thanks Paul! Georgi Valkov httpstorm.com nano RTOS
