Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com> writes: > On 05/05/2023 02:39, Sam James wrote: >> Pádraig Brady <p...@draigbrady.com> writes: >> >>> On 04/05/2023 12:27, Pádraig Brady wrote: >>>> On 04/05/2023 07:27, Schlomo Schapiro wrote: >>>>> Hi Pádraig, >>>>> >>>>> thank you, that will not yet fix the problem in the older distros? What >>>>> about the RPM world with Fedora/RHEL and Archlinux? As far as I can tell >>>>> all cp version 9.x are affected by this. >>>> I'll handle the Fedora 37/38 fixes. >>>> RHEL/Centos and current Archlinux are not affected AFAICS. >>> >>> Fedora 37 and 38 updates are now pending (cc Kamil): >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-65365355b3 >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-4beb422aac >>> >>> The Fedora patches should also apply to the debian bookworm package, >>> so I've opened bugs accordingly at: >>> >>> https://bugs.debian.org/1035530 >>> https://bugs.debian.org/1035531 >>> >>> Schlomo, the second one is the one you're particularly interested in. >> This is relevant to coreutils-9.3, right? > > Right. Specifically only this bug applies to 9.3. I.e.: > https://github.com/coreutils/coreutils/commit/c6b1fe434 > >> In that case, the only way >> I found out Gentoo was affected was by reading bug-coreutils by chance. >> It's not feasible for all package maintainers to read all bug >> trackers >> regularly for all software in their distributions. >> If it's worth filing bug reports in each distro for, it's either >> worth >> a new release > Right. I didn't inform distros that generally go with the latest coreutils > (including Fedora rawhide), as I was planning to do a 9.4 release soonish > to address this (and other bugs), and so it would get picked up automatically. >
That works too, thank you very much! :) >> or at least an email to the distributi...@lists.linux.dev mailing list. > > TIL > best, sam
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
