Pro-tip use globbing. Le ven. 10 mai 2024, 21:52, Laurent Lyaudet <laurent.lyau...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> No, it works also with many files. > Hello, > Best regards, > Laurent Lyaudet > > Le ven. 10 mai 2024, 18:47, Chris Elvidge <celvidge...@gmail.com> a > écrit : > >> Why not use 'wc [options] <filename' >> Obv. only works on a single filename. >> >> On 10/05/2024 at 12:36, Laurent Lyaudet wrote: >> > Hello :), >> > >> > Thanks for your hard work :) >> > I had a need for a variant of wordcount without filenames in the output, >> > tuesday. >> > >> https://github.com/LLyaudet/DevOrSysAdminScripts/blob/main/build_and_checks_dependencies/lines_filters.sh >> > >> https://github.com/LLyaudet/DevOrSysAdminScripts/commit/f0cb3291de4ad0bc63e40baf31364d1af6849f12 >> > I started to make a patch on GNU coreutils on that day, >> > but I had to interrupt and continue today. >> > Here is the patch joined to this email. >> > >> > >> > Best summary of the feature is just to copy-paste my commit message: >> > wc: Add an option -n --no-filenames. >> > >> > wc now has an option -n or --no-filenames to remove the filenames >> > from the output lines. >> > It is useful when used in conjunction with a single option >> > -c, -m, -l, -L, or -w, >> > since the result is a single number per line that can be easily used >> > in shell (Bash) scripts, >> > without having to pipe the result with cut. >> > >> > doc/coreutils.texi: Add option -n to documentation. >> > NEWS: Mention the change option -n added and justify it. >> > src/wc.c: Modify the source code to have an option -n. >> > tests/wc/wc-no-filenames.sh: Test --no-filenames option for wc. >> > >> > >> > Note that it should be a -f --filenames option if the default was >> different. >> > If the default was configurable, >> > then we should have -f --filenames -n --no-filenames options, >> > like is possible in some of the latest versions of argparse in Python >> > (argparse.BooleanOptionalAction). >> > I don't know how to handle that in C code. >> > Please accept my patch and improve upon it if needed. >> > >> > Best regards, >> > Laurent Lyaudet >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> Chris Elvidge >> >> >>
