Paul Eggert <[email protected]> writes: > I thought that fts_path had unreliable contents after fts_read fails, > which would mean the proposed patch would lead to unreliable behavior. > What am I missing?
In src/du.c we have the following:
ent = fts_read (fts);
if (ent == NULL)
{
if (errno != 0)
{
error (0, errno, _("fts_read failed: %s"),
quotef (fts->fts_path));
ok = false;
}
Perhaps that should be changed? I'm not sure of that behavior, to be
honest.
Collin
