Karl Fogel wrote:
> Turns out it may be more complex than just checking `logoff' in
> main.c, as I'm not sure the server would have gotten that option by
> then, but I haven't yet looked enough to be sure...
I did it but only tested it on direct access. I don't know how to install
CVS in server mode.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Larry Jones) writes:
> > I think so. Note that you could also allow anyone to write to just the
> > history file (you don't have to allow them to write the whole tree),
I don't think it's a good solution. I think only (Unix) group should have
write access on it.
> > ... or
> > you could simply remove the history file entirely (CVS is happy with no
> > history file, it just isn't happy with having one that isn't writable).
Is it really a good solution ? Doesn't CVS use this file for 'history'
command ?
