[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/08/2000 04:24:19 PM
>> It seems you've been more thorough than I have. Looking at it another way,
"cvs
>> up -C file" should be equivalent to "cvs up -p -r <base-rev> file >file".
If
>> other flags (eg "-j") were specified, the command should be equivalent to
"cvs
>> up -p -r <base-rev> file >file; cvs up <other-flags> file".
>
>That's the parallelism I was looking for. I agree completely.
I forgot to mention (but I think it was implied) that the two-part statement
should conceptually be atomic.
Noel
