"J. Cone" wrote:
> At 13:54 07/12/00 -0500, you wrote:
> >> Perhaps the combination of ".trunk" and ".origin"
> >> is just senseless.
> >
> >Hmm. Yeah, and cvs co -r1.1 would do the same thing. The only thing
> >meaningful I can think of for .trunk.origin would be to retreive the earliest
> >incarnation of the vendor branch, if present.
>
> Unless you're us, with a repository converted from RCS :-)
In which case old static tags still seem to be more meaningful and the dead
revisions would still have to be inserted into all the original repository files
in the other case.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
If vegetarians eat vegetables, what do humanitarians eat?
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
