Karl Fogel writes:
>
> IMHO, if it's very hard to write a test for it, then the best thing to
> do is check it in anyway, and somewhere list the absence of the test
> case as a bug in itself (if you want). Just because something's hard
> to test automatically hopefully shouldn't mean it can't go into the
> code. :-)
I'll second that. There are lots of things involving client/server that
aren't tested because there isn't any easy way to test them in
sanity.sh; in many cases (including this one), having pserver work at
all in real life is a sufficient test.
-Larry Jones
Your gender would be a lot more tolerable if it wasn't so darn cynical!
-- Calvin
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
