"Cameron, Steve" wrote:
> Karl Fogel wrote:
>
> > But the majority of patches received don't fit these qualifications.
> > This isn't meant to be some sort of off-putting, elitist statement,
> > and I hope it doesn't sound that way -- the same thing can be said of
> > 90% of the patches sent to 90% of the free software projects in the
> > world.
> [smc] Part of the (perceived) problem might be that for those 90%
> of the patches that fail to live up to the standards, there is
> generally
> not much, if any, constructive criticism, or that's been my
> experience
Any immediate thoughts on Steve's .trunk/.origin patch if I do the initial
review & testing? I will post my thoughts after review and testing and
before applying, regardless.
Derek
P.S. He posted the wrong link to his patch this time around. It's actually
http://www.geocities.com/dotslashstar/branch_patch.html.
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
"If triangles had a God, He'd have three sides."
-- Old Yiddish Proverb
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
