Stephen Cameron wrote:
> I ran into a small snag that "cvs tag -F -b" already has a meaning. So, I
> introduced "-B" which means, "it's ok to disturb branch tags".
>
> With my patch in its current state:
>
> "cvs tag -F -b -B" may convert non-branch tags to branch tags
> and vice versa.
>
> "cvs tag -F -B" may convert branch tags to non-branch tags, but will not
> disturb non-branch tags.
>
> "cvs tag -F -b" may change a non-branch tag to a branch tag, but will not
> disturb an existing branch tag.
>
> "cvs tag -d -B" may delete branch tags, but not non-branch tags.
> "cvs tag -d" may delete non-branch tags, but not branch tags.
>
> Same goes for "rtag"
These all sound good. Pity we needed a new option.
> Patch is here:
> http://www.geocities.com/branch_patch.html#tagpatch
Okay, found your posting from today. At first glance it looks like you've got
docs and tests. Reading through it now and I will test it soon.
Derek
--
Derek Price CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] CollabNet ( http://collab.net )
--
I often speculate on why you don't return to America. Did you abscond with the
church funds? Did you run off with the senator's wife? I like to think that
you killed a man. It's the romantic in me.
- Claude Rains as Captain Louis Renault, _Casablanca_
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
