On Thu, 7 Mar 2002, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> I removed csh from almost all of my systems long ago.
Ah, I envy you. :-) I refuse to ignore the package dependencies on my
systems though...
> I still have no interest in re-writing sccs2rcs into perl though.... :-)
Well, I did it for two reasons:
1. the package dependencies (which I guess you don't mind ;-))
2. I have a bunch of SCCS directories I need to convert to RCS and the
csh version of the script is way too slow.
> (I don't think I would ever use sccs2rcs.csh either -- I'd write my own
> conversion tool in POSIX shell if I had to, even though it would be
> trivial for me to either install csh again or find a machine where it is
> still present and working....)
Ah, someone who dislikes csh even more than I do.
<Chop my suggestion that sccs2rcs be removed from the cvs distribution>
>
> I wouldn't have any objection to that! ;-)
Great! Two votes for...
Michael Sterrett
-Mr. Bones.-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Bug-cvs mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
