Derek Price wrote: > The patch does what you said it would on stable, but something else is > wrong on feature. The new watch6-2 test fails - basically, > the previous > watch add appears to be failing without reporting the error. I've > attached a revised patch, with the failing tests (which, > again, pass on > stable).
OK, I'll look into the problems on feature. -- Jim Hyslop Senior Software Designer Leitch Technology International Inc. ( http://www.leitch.com ) Columnist, C/C++ Users Journal ( http://www.cuj.com/experts ) _______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
