Derek Price wrote:
|> | So probably the expression used should connote this. After some |> | consideration, I would vote for '.origin' here. I disagree |> with | being meaningless. I often export a project state into a |> local | repository, work on it, and when I'm done, move the files |> back to | the remote repository's sandbox. During local |> development I often | want to compare to the initial version of a |> file, and using a | single tag for this is just easy. Granted |> there are other ways to | achieve this, but they're not as easy |> to handle. |> |> That's fine for 1.1, but how does this help you for a branch? |> You might want to diff against the root, but it doesn't make much |> sense to care about the first revision on the branch. | | | Good point. What about resolving '.origin' to the very first | revision of the mainline?
I don't have any reason to object to that.
On further consideration, why doesn't -r1.1 suffice for what you want to do?
Regards,
Derek
_______________________________________________ Bug-cvs mailing list Bug-cvs@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs
